Newsletters - Past Issues

Sustainable Green Portfolio- Update June 4, 2018

Hi kids,

Take a look at the new fund I made for sustainable and green investing! Call me but to read about some ideas I have for it, read below!

(530) 559-1214

 

Investing in solar can be done actually in two ways. You can buy or rent a system to provide power to your workplace or abode or add the stocks of solar companies to your investment portfolio. Adding a solar system will help lower both your electric bill and the carbon emissions in our environment.

I actually installed a system on my home about 3 years ago using the lease system program.  I paid nothing for the equipment and now just pay a flat fee to the solar company for each Kilowatt it generates. The price I pay is a lot lower than the upper tiers of charges that PG&E bangs me for so it’s a win-win for myself and the company that put my system in. I also pay no maintenance fees and if it breaks they fix it at their expense. Pretty neat deal if I do say so myself.

Although solar stocks have gone up and down and down and up with no real clues as to where they might go next, and with a spotty history of success as to returning investor dollars with any positive returns, the latest statistics might point to a change of direction in the future for those throwing their hard earned investment dollars in the suns direction. California ranks number five in the world geographies in solar capacity. Not too surprising given the number of tree huggers living in the state, as well as having lots of sunshine and also being geographically ginormous. The statistic certainly adds an even an brighter light to an already sunny state.

Adding even more fuel to the solar fire (pun intended) is the latest ruling from the California Energy Commission which mandated all newly constructed homes have solar panels. There are of course hooks, crooks and stipulations surrounding the new regulation but in a nutshell the amount of solar powered homes is expected to jump six-fold by the year 2020. Putting that in real numbers, today about 15,000 new homes and 135,000 occupied homes are fitted each annually. Those numbers jump to an estimated 100,000 new systems and overall about 235,000 in total.

Of course, few things come without a cost and new home owners will pony up an additional ten grand or more to comply with the mandate. The homebuilders meanwhile aren’t too wild about having to raise prices to the home buying public, especially sensitive to the latest figures just out on the number of homes being sold coupled with interest rates on the rise. All this likely spells more difficulty for the homebuilders and it remains to be seen just how these companies will cope with the challenges. Of course there is cheering and jeering on from both sides of the room once again as governmental mandates which alter costs and charges to consumers and companies always manage to stir the pot of debate and this latest regulation is no exception.

No doubt the environmental advocates will cheer on the regulation as a victory for their side while the free market proponents will tout this is just another example of government interference and meddling all the while adding to the ever rising cost of living for the average Joe, not to mention the loss of jobs in the homebuilding industry should sales slow because of it.

No matter where you stand on the issue, no doubt there will be more solar systems sold and that means the companies that make all things solar may reap the rewards. That being said, investing is never that easy, and be aware that the news is already public and that means it could already be baked into the proverbial cake of stock prices. Additionally the history of solar upstarts is littered with dead bodies and one only needs to look at the last time government dipped its hands into solar when the Obama administration in early 2009  loaned Solyndra 535 million of stimulus money only to see those funds disappear down the rat hole of a bankruptcy filing.

Opps…..

More often they many care to admit, where the government goes, private business often follows in straitjackets meaning central planning and private enterprise usually don’t mix well. Investors should heed the not so obvious caveats and use more than due diligence before following the governments lead into solar with their investing dollars.


 

Update on the markets and more- May 2, 2018

Income Portfolio- Call for details

 

Hello Money Matters listeners and readers,

Well the markets seem to be in some sort of limbo bouncing around 23,000/24,000 levels and although some stocks are moving up, others are moving down and some are sideways. The Dow has been basically stuck in a rut compared to the last year or so.
So what is going on?

It is hard to say but the two sell offs since February might have put some fear into investors. The ongoing Trump issues seem to hit the news wires daily and no one really knows what the heck he might do. Tax reductions are helping some families and businesses but the geopolitical events tend to slingshot the markets back and forth depending on the day. I am looking hard at inflation and therefore energy and metals and we are positioned accordingly. Consumer staple companies, the ones that make food, cleaning stuff and the like have been hit hard with other retail stocks suffering from (here is a new coined word by yours truly) “Amazonenza”, meaning the online retail juggernaut is shaking retailers worldwide as well as the old stalwarts like the ones the make the stuff in your cabinet and pantry. Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is definitely a world changer. Whether you like Amazon or not, you cannot deny its effect and change in the world of how we buy things. That being said, let’s move on to some insights as to inflation, making a budget and an old favorite, dividend stocks. Read on….

 

-------------------------------------------

 

Inflation starting to heat up? 
Humm......

 

Are commodities waking up?

Simply put, commodities are the things that the things we might buy are made of. They include items such as certain food stuffs, energy fuels, metals and precious metals. You might assume that a booming economy would increase demand for commodities. It seems a logical conclusion but note I didn’t say a booming stock market, although a rising stock market is sometimes mistaken for a booming economy. The fact remains sometimes it is and sometimes it isn’t.

Look at the stock market since 2010. Although measured by the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) which has more than tripled from late spring 2009 to where it is today, these basic items called commodities have languished. In a Feb 20th, 2017 article by Forbes entitled “Commodities have been down for so long….” author Daniel Fisher summed up the stark reality of commodities performance by saying “The U.S. Commodity Index Fund, not surprisingly, has a five-year record of negative 8.4% a year”

This would cause some to ask: why, if the market is rising for so many years, are commodities not participating in the increase?

That was a question I answered in my December 13, 2017 article entitled “Commodities- Is the rally for real” which basically put forth the argument the stock market rally might not be because of the increased demand for stuff, but rather just an increase in the demand of stock ownership.

Fast forward to today and in taking another look at commodities since that article hit the airwaves, there is indeed some signs some might argue that the bungee cord type of relationship between the stock market and commodities might finally be reaching its snap back point.

In a recent article by Greg Guenther entitled “Revealed: A New Commodity Rally has Arrived” , he makes the argument that commodities may finally be being pulled upwards by real demand by manufactures who in turn are responding to a real increase in demand by consumers buying more stuff. Energy prices have popped higher in April along with the precious metal gold whose price is stealthily approaching its January 2018 highs. The next milestone so says Mr. Guenther, is gold’s next stop of the July 2016 high of $1,377.00 an ounce. Meanwhile Guenther notes that shares of companies that mine the metal have yet to confirm an upward trend in the yellow metal of Midas and therefore commodities in general.

The industrial metal copper also plays an important part to trying to predict where things might go or so some analysts believe. Dr. Copper as copper is sometimes called for its purported relationship to future market movements, is also rising and testing its January highs. It is believed by some that copper, being used in many an industrial application, and will rise in price as industrial products become more in demand. Copper it is thought can therefore sniff out a coming rally in the stock market. Copper popped 3% on April 20th causing those that believe Dr. Copper is indeed a precursor to market movement to sit up and take notice. As indicated in my above referenced December article on the validity of the stock market rally and its relationship to commodities, I am of the opinion that if this market rally is for real, the rise in commodity pricing will eventually have to follow.

Only time will tell if Dr. Copper will continue its ascent and follow the recent rise in the energy and gold sectors, but if not, it won’t be the first convincing head fake that fools those believing in such relationships and it likely won’t be the last. Once again we realize hindsight is foresight and only in hindsight will we know if recent price increase in certain asset classes are indeed telling us which way the markets will go.

Keep in mind no one can predict future market movements with certainty and that includes Dr. Copper and its followers or any other asset class one may tend to look at.

-----------------------------------------------------

Take some time to make a budget!

 

Daily budgets are rarely made by families but doing so can be highly educational as it highlights what one spends and where the money is going. I don’t know of anyone that can’t benefit from a detailed budget written down on paper and then reviewed by all members of the family.  Actually sitting down and doing it seems a daunting task but biting the bullet and doing one will likely pay healthy and needed dividends.

I can almost guarantee taking the time to perform this task will be akin to finding money in your mailbox. How much you find will depend on how much you spend each month and how accurately and honest your budget is. Yes, honesty is a weird word to use here but if you think about it for a bit, you can conjure up a few instances why one might not be 100% honest on a budget. The reasons for dishonesty might run the gamut from a harmless hobby you don’t want to give up on to a more ominous reason such as feeding an addiction that consumes funds.

Whatever the details, making a budget will always yield something worthwhile and so it’s a great exercise to do. If you or your family is struggling to make ends meet, this is all the more reason you should consider doing it.

When making out your budget, its best to have your checkbook and credit card statements handy as these could highlight something your memory might fail you at. The point here is you want to list everything you spend money on, both reoccurring and the one-off expenditures. Those one-off expenditures are obviously scrutinized in hindsight since they may not reoccur. They may however illustrate whether a good decision or bad one had been made for the expenditure.

Start by listing every dollar that went out whether reoccurring or not. Do this for several months in a row if you have the fortitude to do so, otherwise a one month review is better than nothing.

After listing all your expenses, list your incomes for the family or yourself if doing this on your own. You will end up with a conclusion, of which you already may realize, of whether you’re operating in the red (spending more than you take in) or in the black which means you make more than you spend.

No matter what side of the spending aisle you fall on, the goal here is to be able to actually see and compare where your money is going.

Next determine what spending is discretionary and which is mandatory. A mandatory spending destination might be a mortgage payment (paying the minimum required) while a discretionary one might be a movie or date night. I like to list the items in order of summation meaning the largest expenditures in order to the smallest. Then list the semi-discretionary items such as cable TV, an optional data plan on your phone or fancy steaks in lieu of hamburger when you grocery shop.

First, take your monthly income and subtract the mandatory items. The remaining amount will be what is left over for discretionary and semi-discretionary spending. The first items to then review for cutting is the purely discretionary spending. This is where will you find the easiest “mailbox” money.

Do you spend a lot going out to eat, buying three pairs of shoes or going to five movies a month with candy and popcorn? It’s not rocket science to think of ways to cut. Buy your candy out (the theaters won’t like it buy hey), forego the sodas (your body will thank you) and try renting a movie at home once in a while. DVD’s are free at the library don’t ya know.

In any case, discretionary spending is usually higher than people think and once illustrated in an “in your face” spreadsheet, the “red face” of embarrassment over where your money is really going usually appears.

Don’t be embarrassed. We all get a little “frowny faced” when we see just what and where we are possibly wasting our money on.

One can also usually find money in the semi-discretionary column as well. Larger than necessary phone plans or excess luxuries like dry cleaning or cell phones for the 7 year old also can steal funds that may needed elsewhere for more basic needs.

Once in a while a mandatory large item is found to be the main culprit and a major change must be made. This might be too large of a house or car, too long of a commute or other item that may seem mandatory. But considering a onetime major overhaul in this area could significantly improve one’s financial condition and find the largest amount of money. This might include moving to a smaller house or closer to work or getting rid of the extra car.

The point is to make a budget first and worry about what’s on it once it’s made. Making a few small changes in your spending habits can make big differences over a long period of time. Look for pennies and the dollars will find you.

 

-------------------------------------

 

What is a dividend?

Dividends are payments by companies to people who own their stock. When we think of a bank savings account we think of the interest they might pay us. With stocks, there can be different types of payments and dividends are one kind of payment. Think of it like a thank you note for buying a company’s stock. Some stocks and funds pay dividends and some do not.

Let’s say you buy a stock of Jack’s Warehouse (fictional). The stock is a dividend paying stock. Let’s also say you buy a share of Jill Muffin Company (fictional) and Jill’s doesn’t pay a dividend.

Jacks stock says it will pay a dollar a share annually, paying 25 cents on a certain day every three months. Over the course of a year, that amounts to a buck. Note I didn’t say a percentage but an actual dollar amount and in this case a buck.

For sake of example, say you bought both Jill’s stock and Jacks stock at 10 bucks on January first and at the end of the year both stocks are at 11 bucks. Each had the same increase in price, one dollar from ten to eleven. Both stocks made 10% for you. Jacks stock however also paid you a dividend of a dollar. Nice.

Keeping mind dividends are listed in dollar amounts and not percentages, if you buy a stock for ten bucks and get a dollar dividend you made 10 % on the dividend. However if the stock drops in price such as in a market crash, and the company keeps the dividend, the next buyer, since he buys the stock at a lower price, say 8 bucks, he still gets a dollar a share in dividends so he makes more percentage wise and in that particular case comes out to 12.5 %. One reason why if you buy dividend stocks you might make the argument you like market crashes because your yield percentage wise is greater.

Can a dividend be cut, eliminated or even increased? Absolutely. Dividends are not guaranteed. But keep this in mind. Usually company CEOS, VPS’s and board members get stock as part of their compensation. So they benefit from the dividends as well. The more shares they hold the more they make as well. The dirty little secret however is dividends can be taxed at lower rates then salaries. Single taxpayers can now make $50,600 (in 2018) and still qualify for the zero-percent tax on dividends and capital gains.  Joint filers and surviving spouses can make $101,200, and head of household filers can make $75,700.

 When you compare that to personal income statistics in the U.S., you’ll see that about 70% of taxpayers in the U.S. can qualify for the zero rate on dividends and capital gains!

Even if you make too much money to qualify for the 0% tax rate on dividends and capital gains, you can still qualify for a special low 15% rate.

So do you think company execs want to cut or eliminate your dividend when they get them too and might pay less tax than their salaries?

All in all if you like the possibility of income or just growing your nest egg, and you consider some stocks pay dividends and some don’t, which  would you rather own?

For more information feel free to contact me below.


 

Money Update- "What about those tariffs" Where is the market headed? April 15, 2018

 

 

Are YOU ready for earnings seasons? Well GET ready!

 

Money Matter fans and readers,

Some markets eh? Well with all the fuss running about from Washington, China, Korea and who knows where else, I am not concerned for now at least as far as the market goes and our portfolios. As indicated in previous shows and articles lately, a correction of a technical nature was needed and long overdue. We sold no positions for the reason of fear. Only reallocated to other areas if I thought prudent. We also added some positions in areas I think are attractive. As also noted recently, the earnings season started on Friday and I mentioned some big banks were up first and they had set the bar high so I was cautious on friday's start and how the earning season would begin but then also mentioned I thought good things were in store. Friday indeed was mixed from the banks right on cue and now its on to the bulk of earning reports and I am of the opinion it should be a great next couple of weeks bar any political upheavals (but we all know those can happen!)

So let us see if I am right and watch markets rally with good earnings. My opinion only of course as always! Now read on about the tariffs and my take on them and also about my favorite: Dividend Paying Stocks and Funds,


"Watching the markets so you dont have to"
Marc

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

 

The media has been rife with news about the Trump steel tariffs and the opinions run the gamut from full support to outright stern objection. The argument is not so much about whether our steel industries need protection as whole as an argument could be and has been made that China, the target of the tariffs, has been playing unfairly in the arena of free trade. Although most of the media coverage has centered around the specifics of the industry in question, the microscope of analysis should be explaining and detailing how tariffs are thought to work and whether tariffs in general are a useful and efficient remedy to such maladies. Simply put, this particular tariff is an additional tax placed on Chinese steel. Therefore the price of domestic steel would not be reduced.

 

The obvious reasoning is that by making an import more expensive though tariffs and thereby making American steel more attractive by comparison, our domestic steel industry would benefit.

 

The first question I would ask is wouldn't a tax credit offered to our steel companies serve the same purpose?

 

Think of it this way:by installing tariffs on imported steel, the price of domestic steel would not drop in nominal terms. The cost savings to the industries that use steel therefore would not be reduced. These steel consuming industries such as the auto and packaging companies to name a few would see no savings.

 

Meanwhile the tariff money goes into the coffers of those that initiated the tax, and that means into government coffers.

 

I have always made the argument that if the governing authorities want to help the bulk of the economy, meaning the consumer, a tax credit would serve the same purpose by giving our industries the needed break in question.

 

The difference is by allowing domestic steel companies to take a tax credit, they could offer their steel at lower prices to those consuming it. That in turn would mean lower steel prices to those that make the end products which is all the stuff you and I buy that use steel. This would result in a general price reduction in all products that use steel and its related products and that in turn would mean more money in the pockets of American consumers to spend on other items in the economy.

 

Conversely, when a tariff is used, there is no price reduction in the end product which means the consumer saves nothing. The money which is the tariff tax goes into government coffers and that should be the end of the story but it’s not. It is generally believed the import tariffs actually cause price increases in whatever end product is in question so you get a double whammy and not in your favor dear reader.

 

One could argue the government would use those additional monies to spend on whatever it spends its money on, but since the consumer is the driving force of all economies, putting that money into the hands of the everyday Joe would not only help a struggling constituency which is all of us, but get into the economy that much quicker.

 

It’s believed by some, this analyst included, that money in the hands of consumers is more wisely spent with less waste than putting that money into an already bloated bureaucracy known as Uncle Sam.

 

In each specific case a tariff is implemented, the subsequently higher priced import does make the domestic product more attractive by comparison, but besides stuffing government coffers, the consumer would see no benefit from reduced prices. In fact the consumer would likely see higher prices. Compare this to a tax credit which would have a similar effect on domestic steel demand yet have the additional benefit of lowering prices to the consumer.

 

That the powers at be wish to help domestic producers and assist in what arguably could be unfair practices is the obvious reasoning. That the money goes into the hands of Washington instead of into the American consumer is the larger issue and something few people are even discussing.

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Grab your part of the distributions~

 

What is a dividend?

Dividends are payments by companies to people who own their stock. When we think of a bank savings account we think of the interest they might pay us. With stocks, there can be different types of payments and dividends are one kind of payment. Think of it like a thank you note for buying a company’s stock. Some stocks and funds pay dividends and some do not.

Let’s say you buy a stock of Jack’s Warehouse (fictional). The stock is a dividend paying stock. Let’s also say you buy a share of Jill Muffin Company (fictional) and Jill’s doesn’t pay a dividend.

Jacks stock says it will pay a dollar a share annually, paying 25 cents on a certain day every three months. Over the course of a year, that amounts to a buck. Note I didn’t say a percentage but an actual dollar amount and in this case a buck.

For sake of example, say you bought both Jill’s stock and Jacks stock at 10 bucks on January first and at the end of the year both stocks are at 11 bucks. Each had the same increase in price, one dollar from ten to eleven. Both stocks made 10% for you. Jacks stock however also paid you a dividend of a dollar. Nice.

Keeping mind dividends are listed in dollar amounts and not percentages, if you buy a stock for ten bucks and get a dollar dividend you made 10 % on the dividend. However if the stock drops in price such as in a market crash, and the company keeps the dividend, the next buyer, since he buys the stock at a lower price, say 8 bucks, he still gets a dollar a share in dividends so he makes more percentage wise and in that particular case comes out to 12.5 %. One reason why if you buy dividend stocks you might make the argument you like market crashes because your yield percentage wise is greater.

Can a dividend be cut, eliminated or even increased? Absolutely. Dividends are not guaranteed. But keep this in mind. Usually company CEOS, VPS’s and board members get stock as part of their compensation. So they benefit from the dividends as well. The more shares they hold the more they make as well. The dirty little secret however is dividends can be taxed at lower rates then salaries. Single taxpayers can now make $50,600 (in 2018) and still qualify for the zero-percent tax on dividends and capital gains.  Joint filers and surviving spouses can make $101,200, and head of household filers can make $75,700.

 When you compare that to personal income statistics in the U.S., you’ll see that about 70% of taxpayers in the U.S. can qualify for the zero rate on dividends and capital gains!

Even if you make too much money to qualify for the 0% tax rate on dividends and capital gains, you can still qualify for a special low 15% rate.

So do you think company execs want to cut or eliminate your dividend when they get them too and might pay less tax than their salaries?

All in all if you like the possibility of income or just growing your nest egg, and you consider some stocks pay dividends and some don’t, which  would you rather own?

For more information feel free to contact me below.

Dividends are not guaranteed and can be decreased,  increased or eliminated at any time. Dividends do not guarantee against losses. Dividends may be taxable in certain types of accounts and stocks which pay dividends does not mean losses, either partial or total are not possible. Please review the prospectus of any company you are considering and consult with your investment professional before making any investment decisions. Investing involves risk. You can lose money. This article expresses the opinions of Marc Cuniberti and are opinions only and should not be construed or acted upon as individual investment advice. Mr. Cuniberti is an Investment Advisor Representative through Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc., a Registered Investment Advisor. Marc can be contacted at SMC Wealth Management, 164 Maple St #1, Auburn, CA 95603 (530) 559-1214. SMC and Cambridge are not affiliated. His website is www.moneymanagementradio.com. California Insurance License # OL34249


 

Update March 21, 2018

 

The Foothill Event Center Seminar was almost packed!

 

 

 

 

We say thank you and goodbye for now! Our audience seemed to like it and learned a lot about investments, estate planning and the new tax reform laws

-----------------------------------------------

 

 

Hello Fans, 

What a great seminar.Thanks for all who came and the Foothill Event Center and all who helped out. Stay tuned for our next one. This one was free for the coming and what an event it was!

We have another coming up on how to run and operate a small business both from the pragmatic side and the motivational side. Motivational expert Machen MacDonald and I will be hosting the June event and you can sign up now to reserve a seat by calling me at (530) 559-1214. If you would like to know what you missed last night, also call me and lets have coffee and review your existing holdings or ideas and then chat. With the market going up, down and around, paying attention to it and your money is important. Wondering what will happen next? Want to protect against losses? Save for a rainy day?

You know where to find me. (530) 559-1214.

Enjoy the read below.......

 

------------------------------

 

Will Trump get his steel tariff? Likely so, but what will it mean?

 

223671

 

The media has been rife with news about the Trump steel tariffs and the opinions run the gamut from full support to outright stern objection. The argument is not so much about whether our steel industries need protection as whole as an argument could be and has been made that China, the target of the tariffs, has been playing unfairly in the arena of free trade. Although most of the media coverage has centered around the specifics of the industry in question, the microscope of analysis should be explaining and detailing how tariffs are thought to work and whether tariffs in general are a useful and efficient remedy to such maladies. Simply put, this particular tariff is an additional tax placed on Chinese steel. Therefore the price of domestic steel would not be reduced.

 

The obvious reasoning is that by making an import more expensive though tariffs and thereby making American steel more attractive by comparison, our domestic steel industry would benefit.

 

The first question I would ask is wouldn't a tax credit offered to our steel companies serve the same purpose?

 

Think of it this way:by installing tariffs on imported steel, the price of domestic steel would not drop in nominal terms. The cost savings to the industries that use steel therefore would not be reduced. These steel consuming industries such as the auto and packaging companies to name a few would see no savings.

 

Meanwhile the tariff money goes into the coffers of those that initiated the tax, and that means into government coffers.

 

I have always made the argument that if the governing authorities want to help the bulk of the economy, meaning the consumer, a tax credit would serve the same purpose by giving our industries the needed break in question.

 

The difference is by allowing domestic steel companies to take a tax credit, they could offer their steel at lower prices to those consuming it. That in turn would mean lower steel prices to those that make the end products which is all the stuff you and I buy that use steel. This would result in a general price reduction in all products that use steel and its related products and that in turn would mean more money in the pockets of American consumers to spend on other items in the economy.

 

Conversely, when a tariff is used, there is no price reduction in the end product which means the consumer saves nothing. The money which is the tariff tax goes into government coffers and that should be the end of the story but it’s not. It is generally believed the import tariffs actually cause price increases in whatever end product is in question so you get a double whammy and not in your favor dear reader.

 

One could argue the government would use those additional monies to spend on whatever it spends its money on, but since the consumer is the driving force of all economies, putting that money into the hands of the everyday Joe would not only help a struggling constituency which is all of us, but get into the economy that much quicker.

 

It’s believed by some, this analyst included, that money in the hands of consumers is more wisely spent with less waste than putting that money into an already bloated bureaucracy known as Uncle Sam.

 

In each specific case a tariff is implemented, the subsequently higher priced import does make the domestic product more attractive by comparison, but besides stuffing government coffers, the consumer would see no benefit from reduced prices. In fact the consumer would likely see higher prices. Compare this to a tax credit which would have a similar effect on domestic steel demand yet have the additional benefit of lowering prices to the consumer.

 

That the powers at be wish to help domestic producers and assist in what arguably could be unfair practices is the obvious reasoning. That the money goes into the hands of Washington instead of into the American consumer is the larger issue and something few people are even discussing.

 

This article expresses the opinions of Marc Cuniberti and are opinions only and should not be construed or acted upon as individual investment advice. Mr. Cuniberti is an Investment Advisor Representative through Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc., a Registered Investment Advisor. Marc can be contacted at SMC Wealth Management, 164 Maple St #1, Auburn, CA 95603 (530) 559-1214. SMC and Cambridge are not affiliated. His website is www.moneymanagementradio.com. California Insurance License # OL34249..